4.15.2009

Video report, 4/14

Hey everyone. I have disabled auto-play for this fine video.

If you missed it, you should feel shame. You may click below to make restitution.

AFTERNOON NOTE: I will be out of pocket this afternoon. Please have fun in my absence.

477 comments:

  1. Anonymous12:35 AM

    Everybody's heard that the Bird is the Word.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AWK, I assed you a question in the previous thread ...

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Samoli pirates have attacked another US ship...messed up

    ReplyDelete
  4. The pirates are about to be eradicated. The Navy has been waiting, what, 60 years to accomplish something major on the water?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12:39 AM

    I sent you an invite then had to bail for Trial observations. Boo real life.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Daddy was raking with his silenced STG-44.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous12:41 AM

    I don't know why, but I have recently become a fan of the BAR... and the always trusty MP40. God Bless America.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yeah the Navy needs to get to work

    ReplyDelete
  9. I loathe the MP40. Sounds like it's firing Tic Tacs.

    I must say: I experience some cognitive dissonance when using simulated Nazi guns. It's not healthy.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Jay are you suggesting your a pirate?

    ReplyDelete
  11. All aboard the Jolly Roger! Ahoy!

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'll join I'm on board we can do big things!
    Arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous12:50 AM

    I like the Gewehr as well, with the attached noob tube. Makes the initial 10 seconds of a search and destroy match very humorous.

    Why didn't the pirates enjoy the movie Deep Blue Sea?

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm wrappin' this one up, fellas. Piece to j00.

    ReplyDelete
  15. jgt, i listened to MC&IS for first time in years on the way back from montgomery today. weird you would put that song in the vid.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Night, I'm worried about having a nightmare of losing to Ball State... That's why I'm still up

    ReplyDelete
  17. The offensive line depth and injuries will likely be the deciding factor with this team. It won't take many injuries before they we have to move defensive linemen over.

    ReplyDelete
  18. the coalition navies should search every ship they can find that even looks like it may be a pirate ship. if contraband is found on board, make 'em walk the plank. if they don't get the message after that, let it be known you will blow them out of the water on sight, no questions asked until this crap stops. eventually the insurance rates on ship traveling the area will be so astronomical, the shipping companies will simply go around tanzania and avoid those waters altogether.

    if only AU qbs were half as accurate as Navy SEAL snipers...

    ReplyDelete
  19. Navy cant run after hundreds of little boats all over the ocean.

    I don't think I want to provide protection to commercial ships on my tab. Tell them to carry ammo and blow up any little boat that gets too close.

    ReplyDelete
  20. A Good Morning to all!!

    'Preciate the late work last night JGT.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous7:34 AM

    Good morning and Happy Hump Day, Hotties! I gave myself a mid-week treat and took the day off. It was so nice rolling out of bed at 7:00 instead of trying to peel myself out at 3:30.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous7:34 AM

    For those who missed it, you can download The Gridiron Breakdown from last night where Jay G. Tate was on in the first segment. The entire show was dedicated to the discussion of Auburn football.

    Enjoy!

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous7:35 AM

    It is the featured episode from 4/14/09, by the way.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous7:43 AM

    I don't know nearly as much about football as the rest of you Hotties, but the lack of depth at OL is very worrisome.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Me neither, Luv, but I agree with you completely...scary

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous7:51 AM

    Did they not have time to go after those types of players or could they just not get them?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Luv, I think it was a mixture of both. Regardless, it was a recruiting foul-up of massive proportions. It'll take this staff 2-3 years to recover there.

    ReplyDelete
  28. They really needed Jermaine Johnson. He made a surprisingly abrupt change in affiliation once Tuberville et. al were fired/resigned.

    ReplyDelete
  29. my favorite Pumpkins' song. nice work.

    i love having 7 offensive linemen. ausome. :(

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous7:59 AM

    Well, hopefully, the next 2-3 years won't be as woefully miserable (and almost painful at times!) as last season.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Mike Slade looks like he's really put on some weight. It was much needed though!

    Great song Jay G!

    ReplyDelete
  32. Anonymous8:09 AM

    Luv..as you say, you may not know much about football, but you do seem to have good reading comprehension skills, because you have grasped the biggest weakness/potential disaster with the AU team.

    Right after NSD, Ron Mexico was lamenting our OL woes and I differed with him that we still could be OK if several of the backups stepped up. This assumed we could have a good 2 deep(not enough players for anything more). Well.. we've had more OL attrition and I haven't heard much about others steppping in to challenge. The way this bad run of luck keeps going, we'll be lucky to have 2 deep OL to suit up next season.

    The scout free site indicates that we are on the interested list for about 2 of the top 30 OL in the nation. It's still early in the recruiting wars, but IMO, the fans should be following OL recruiting instead of swooning over 5* RBs. so much.

    Folks say we haven't recruited talent the past few years. I think the problem is that there has been an a tremendous amount of player attrition. That statement takes a lot of tedious research to back up and I don't have the time right now..any volunteers?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Thanks for the footage Mr Jay G Tate!
    Thanks for the link Sensi!

    Not sure if this is a concern or not, but there seems to be a lot of facial hair and gaps in front teeth this year. Hopefully that will make up for our depth on the Offensive line, and DB inexperience

    ReplyDelete
  34. Anonymous8:19 AM

    mytommyd...Maybe the coaches saw the OL difficulties approaching and ordered some cosmetic mods to hid the lack of depth and intimidate the opposing DL.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Well Hoopie, I'll just have to hope that idea works as good as the "reach and get it" drill

    ReplyDelete
  36. the baseball AU Tigers lost to S.Alabama last nite 5-2. bummer.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Anonymous8:29 AM

    TarHeel, thanks for the video highlight! What a run! I love watching Auburn video highlights! They make me all vaklempt 'cause I LOVE Auburn football!!

    ReplyDelete
  38. JGT,

    Thanks for the footage and for working late into the night to get that up.

    What game are we playing these days?

    ReplyDelete
  39. YoungPJ: Same ol' (Call of Duty and Rock Band 2)

    ReplyDelete
  40. Auburn is the place blue chip receivers go to die. So very true. Thanks for the gridiron breakdown. This is great.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Here's what Pawlowski had to say after Auburn's loss at South Alabama on Tuesday:

    “We didn’t compete. You don’t have to have base hits, but fighting off pitches and giving us quality at bats and we just didn’t have many of those today. We weren’t able to build any innings, we weren’t able to get leadoff guys on and we hit a lot of fly balls. The offense has to be creative and if we don’t hit the home runs it makes it very difficult.”

    ReplyDelete
  42. Luv, here's more info on Connie Frederick:

    FREDERICK

    ReplyDelete
  43. Call of Duty on the 360 right?

    ReplyDelete
  44. Hmm, so Pawlowski is building a team around hitting home runs.

    That doesn't seem like the best strategy to me.

    ReplyDelete
  45. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I've said it before, but staying healthy in the OL and secondary will be the key to our season.

    I hate recruiting, but apparently not as much as our previous staff. (It's a joke SteveFC, don't worry.)

    ReplyDelete
  47. I think you misunderestimated Pawloski's assessment - seems to me he says that our offense needs to get away from relying on the long ball, hence the 'needs to be creative' comment.

    BTW, losing Jermaine Johnson's services on the OL in the transition will hopefully be mitigated by a major improvement in offensive coaching. We supposedly had superior depth on the OL last year, what good did it do us?

    ReplyDelete
  48. I didn't read that as we have to hit home runs, I read it as working the pitcher deep in the count and fouling off stuff until you find your pitch to hit.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Anonymous9:00 AM

    PJ - It sounds more of he is interested in getting people on base for small ball. If you don't have people on base, or don't hit HR's nothing is going to happen.

    I don't think he is going for the Earl Weaver get a 3 run HR every inning.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Anonymous9:00 AM

    Also known as..what everyone else has said before my post.

    ReplyDelete
  51. It's not often you hear a coach say his team didn't compete.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Anonymous9:02 AM

    JGT - Do you think it is good calling them out?

    ReplyDelete
  53. Interesting. I read it different then ya'll. But I can see it that way too.

    To-may-to, to-mah-to?

    ReplyDelete
  54. I don't think depth in the secondary will be the issue. It will offensive line, then linebacker, then defensive line.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Ma--Mario needs to trim up that head. I say give everyone aboard those ships all of the confiscated weapons from the White Hall Casino-That'll take care of the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  56. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Josh, you say you can't see where this team will be better than last season. I think it is pretty obvious the offense will be improved.

    ReplyDelete
  58. I hope this offense will be improved. Unfortunately, it needs to be vastly improved to be competitive.

    ReplyDelete
  59. HTML attempt#2

    Tried to find Jay's show on the net without getting firewalled and it didn't work, but I did happen across this other interwebs radio thingy. Not sure if it's common knowledge, but it's got a lot of variety and I thought I'd share ... again .... hopefully.

    LAUNCHcast

    ReplyDelete
  60. I agree with Steve. The fact that the entire coaching staff is pulling in the same direction has got to make a positive difference.

    ReplyDelete
  61. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Anonymous9:14 AM

    ehyou and Steve, I agree. As long as they are all on the same page, the only way they can go is up!

    ReplyDelete
  63. I'm going to equate our coaching staff with what happened with the Falcons last year. Although they didn't say the same thing they were all looking for the same result and had a common purpose for getting the results they were looking for. Listening to what our coaches have said, it seems like the same thing: they are ALL on the same page.I only hope that our players can pick up as quickly as the pros did.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Quality depth in the secondary will be an issue, also not to be ugly, but the injury to Mike McNeil might be a good thing so that Slade can get more reps.

    This will be more of an issue than at LB.

    ReplyDelete
  65. The way I see it, if we win 6, Chizik gets a pass. I see seven wins as likely. The best I can see is 9 wins, but it will take a lot of luck with regard to injuries.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Steve I think Coach Chiz gets a pass this year, his telling year will be 2010. Truthfully he should be given more time than that, but that may be just me.

    ReplyDelete
  67. How many teams in Div 1A didn't have any injuries at OL last year?

    ReplyDelete
  68. Anonymous9:17 AM

    I don't see 9 wins, but I definitely see more than 4.

    ReplyDelete
  69. I am wondering why we didn't bring in some Juco linemen. It would seem to be an obvious choice.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Anonymous9:19 AM

    mrtommyd, I agree. In order to build the quality team for which Chizik is striving, it will take at least 2 years.

    ReplyDelete
  71. The QB situation has me very concerned. I don't think Malzahn has been able to find a QB he feels can do the job.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Josh Moon is a clown! That is all.

    ReplyDelete
  73. Anonymous9:22 AM

    The QB situation doesn't have me nearly as concerned as the OL situation. If an average QB has an OL that can block and give him time, he can make some plays.

    ReplyDelete
  74. If my assumption at QB is correct, I wouldn't be surprised for Kodi to be the starter with Fannin as the #2 QB. Needless to say, we wouldn't be passing the ball much.

    The problem with that is that if we go smash mouth, as the coaches have said, how does having very little depth on the offensive line fit with smash mouth football. It is scary.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Josh is alright. He is on here occasionally. I just disagree with him.

    ReplyDelete
  76. SteveFC's QB Prediction Carousel amuses me.

    ReplyDelete
  77. I'm waiting for Steve to say that Lee Ziemba will be the #2 QB.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Is Todd learning the offense? Will he join the fray this fall? Has his arm fell off yet?

    ReplyDelete
  79. Chris Todd is going to join that awful band The Fray?

    ReplyDelete
  80. He's over his head like a cable car?

    ReplyDelete
  81. Does he know how to save a life... let alone a team?

    ReplyDelete
  82. Caught a bit of Fineboob yesterday-they had the guy that wrote "The Last Coach" about Bear Bryant on. They were saying there is no way Chizik can be successful because he has taken over a sinking program.How many coaches programs get a new coach when they are on top? Man, I don't know why I tune to 740 ever! Freakin Bammer in the morning, Bammer in the evening, Bammer at suppertime.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Steve-Josh would argue with a rock. Plus he sounds like Peter Brady in the "Time to Change" song.

    ReplyDelete
  84. I keep hearing this stuff about Auburn being a "sinking program" and it doesn't make sense.

    It's been a very good program for a long, long time now.

    One coaching implosion doesn't make Auburn irrelevant. That happens everywhere.

    Yes ... even at Alabama ... thrice this decade.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Jay,

    You know anything about this attempt to match up Auburn and UCLA at the Georgia Dome next year?

    AU/UCLADoesn't look like it's gonna happen but would be a great idea, IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Jay G.
    That's what gets my blood up so much. The radio and newspaper media wait til we have one crappy year and then jump all over it like we are on the same level as Vandy or Kentucky. They act like we are only a good team once every decade or so. I just don't get it. Never seen anything more arrogant than the bammers.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Just like Tenn/UCLA was a great idea last year. Wait...

    ReplyDelete
  88. good find FSJ. i hadn't heard that.

    very odd, though. why would we/AU not want that game? it's not like we'd have to fly to LA for it.

    ReplyDelete
  89. Reasons AU might not want the game:

    USC
    Ga Tech
    K State
    S Florida
    W Va

    Might be getting a little gun-shy right about now

    ReplyDelete
  90. BUT WE BEAT K-STATE!!!!!!!!

    i know, i know. suck.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Auburn is a tough coaching gig because of competition for Bama, UT, UF, and UGA. Fortunately we have had some very good luck with coaches like Shug, Dye, and Tuberville. Even Bowden and Barfield weren't disasters, although Bowden left the program in the worst state I have seen it in my lifetime.

    My QB carousel will continue. It could very well end up life last season, and I think this is what confuses people. If Kodi ends up being the starter, it is very possible that our offense more resembles what we had the second half of last season. In that case, Fannin might actually be a good backup.

    I am a little surprised at the tone I have heard from Jay. The other day he said Todd, we hardly knew you, but he also mentioned that Todd might get in the mix. I think Todd is by far the closest thing we have to a true QB, excluding the two incoming freshman. Caudle would be second.

    I would not call it likely that Todd will be able to compete for the job. I like his decision making ability, but I doubt his arm will last. If his arm is healthy, Todd will likely be your starter. I just have a lot of doubt he will be healthy.

    Why I have these opinions is based upon what I have gleamed from the last 3 OCs. I think Borges and Franklin recognized the problems with Kodi and with Caudle. I think Tuberville wanted Kodi because he loved the way he can scramble, but Tuberville didn't recognize the poor decision making.

    What may end up being the decider is what offense Malzahn decides to install. It really isn't a different offense, but rather the portion of his playbook he decides to install.

    What is the scariest thing you can hear from an Auburn OC? We need to simplify the offense.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Sorry for blogging your blog, Jay. That turned out to be a bit longer than I anticipated.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Jay again thanks, I really enjoy seeing the players up close and talking about different subjects.

    We sure have some night owls on here, I leaves early at night and make up for by being late in the mornings.
    Pirates should be an easy fix. Every ship will have a bull horn and annouce that a boat coming close to them will be blown out of the water unless they turn away. A small cannon to do just that and the will to pull the trigger.

    ReplyDelete
  94. One aspect of the offense that bothers me is the hurry up gotta get 90 plays in with the lack of offensive lineman is wrong. Self distruction made easy will be the end results.
    Wait until you have a full deck before dealing this hand,

    ReplyDelete
  95. Scottie, don't forget we beat W. State as well. We just need to play OOC teams that end in State. We do pretty well w/ them.

    ReplyDelete
  96. digger brings up a good point with the hurry up offense and few linemen.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Man U will get a dose of Portuguese today and be sent packing from the CHAMPION'S LEAGUE.

    That is all.

    ReplyDelete
  98. Has anyone seen where former Duke PG Greg Paulus is talking to Michigan HC Rich Rodriguez about playing for the Wolverines? The article on Foxsports.com states that he has one year of football eligibility left after playing 4 years of basketball.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Depressed, I saw that on ESPN. Would he still have to sit out a year, or since he didn't play football at Duke, would he be eligible right away?

    ReplyDelete
  100. RK, I am not sure on the rule in this situation, but the article stated he was interested in playing THIS season for Michigan, so I assumed he would not have to sit out a year.

    ReplyDelete
  101. Funny take on Paulus playing football:

    http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/the_sporting_blog/entry/view/23067/paulus_works_out_for_packers,_gets_dunked_on

    ReplyDelete
  102. The gov't is considering reviving the use of "letters of marque" (aka privateers) in piratical warfare. This practice was common during the Napoleonic Wars and American Revolution. The privately owned vessels would receive a bounty for every pirate deterred.

    ReplyDelete
  103. ehyou, that sounds great. Michael, are you willing to play pirate and let me deter you?

    ReplyDelete
  104. Michigan is one of the teams I am interested in following this coming season. If they suck butt again this season, could Rich Rod become Unemployed Rod?

    ReplyDelete
  105. Notre Dame will be another interesting one to watch. I used to hate them when they were good. It's hard to hate someone that's pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  106. If Michigan sucks along this year
    Rich Rod will be history
    He is not that well liked to begin with by some of the power brokers of the Big Blue.

    ReplyDelete
  107. Maybe WVU will take him back.

    ReplyDelete
  108. Everybody's all upset about the OL ... why?

    Man, we got Jermaine Johnson, Chaz Ramsey, Lee Tilley, Kyle Coulahan, and Leon Hart is still around, isn't he?

    That's a bunch of guys who'll be playing on Sunday soon.

    (at a bowling alley)

    ReplyDelete
  109. Jet, that's be funny if it wasn't sad.

    ReplyDelete
  110. That would be funny, oops, pulled a Bammer.

    ReplyDelete
  111. Embrace the challenge, Seanzie!

    ReplyDelete
  112. Anonymous1:10 PM

    Hey guys, I heard something pretty cool today. Check this out...

    Auburn freshman using the power of Facebook to recruit for the Tigers

    By Ben Volin | Thursday, March 26, 2009, 02:28 PM


    Auburn freshman quarterback Tyrik Rollison is making life a lot easier for new coach Gene Chizik on the recruiting front.

    Rollison, a four-star quarterback prospect from Sulphur Springs, Texas who will join the Tigers this fall, utilized the far-reaching power of Facebook Wednesday to try to bring former Michigan receiver Toney Clemons to Auburn.

    “”He is no longer with Michigan and is looking for a new place to ball,” Rollison wrote in a public note on Facebook. “We could use him at WR and I was asking for your help. Send him a message saying how much Auburn could use and how much you would like to see him on our squad. Anything from the heart will go a long way. Thanks for the help.”

    Rollison also posted Clemons’ Facebook page, a photo and a video of Clemons’ high school highlights.



    High school photo of Toney Clemons

    Clemens, a 6-foot-3, 205-pound receiver from the Pittsburgh area, was the No. 10-ranked receiver prospect by Scout.com for the class of 2007 and is the cousin of former Michigan receiver and current Arizona Cardinal Steve Breaston

    Clemens had 11 catches for 101 yards and zero touchdowns in 2008. He announced Tuesday he is leaving Ann Arbor with two years of eligibility remaining.

    Rollison posted his note around 12:30 p.m. today, and within two hours had 20-plus Auburn fans on board.

    “Attaboy Ty, recruit your heart out!” one fan wrote.

    “Big Toney, we are ready for you big man. Come be a Tiger. The fans will show you much love,” another fan wrote.

    Clemons received so much support he wrote a note to Rollison and War Eagle Nation that was half thank you letter, half plea to Chizik to bring him aboard.

    “I want to thank you all for the support,” he wrote. “It means alot to me to know there are people that dont truly know me to have my back and welcome and wish me well. I am seriously looking into Auburn and I have plans of contacting the university to see what the interest level and situation would be for me there. I have no problem competing with the best talent daily to win and keep a job and I have no aspirations of going into a situation where things would be easy for me because competition within a program is what truly makes a player better and I know Auburn has that on both sides of the ball. I just want the opportunity to be able to showcase my skills in a manner that will benefit me and the program that I am involved with. Thanks again.”

    ReplyDelete
  113. Cool post AWK, Tyrik needs to make friends with some OL.

    ReplyDelete
  114. I'm out for the afternoon.

    I'll catch up with you later today. Behave!

    ReplyDelete
  115. AWK - Where did you see that?

    ReplyDelete
  116. Just read the post earlier about AU turning down a GA dome trip to play UCLA. Why would we do that? That would be great national exposure and be a sweet out of conference game - win or loose. Unless there is some other hidden reason, I think it is a stupid move.

    LT

    ReplyDelete
  117. Maybe Jacobs thought UCLA was the University of Central Lower Alabama and figured we already had one lower level school on our schedule.

    ReplyDelete
  118. Goldberg has a post up where Jacobs lays out his reasons. Basically, we already had 12 games, and we are already playing a big out of conference game against Clemson.

    I understand where he is coming from, but that sure would be awesome to have another big time out of conference game.

    ReplyDelete
  119. Actually the reason is money. Jacobs didn't want to give up the extra home game for a neutral site game.

    The sad thing is, the game was proposed for 2010 where we have 8 home games and 4 road games. I'm sure we could have cancelled the UTC Mocs off our schedule and made it work if we had really wanted to.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Anonymous1:39 PM

    Jacobs is a tool.

    The sooner Auburn sheds itself of this loser, the better.

    ReplyDelete
  121. It only makes us look bad when stories of us turning down top level games come out...especially when you look at our schedule and see the 1-AA school that we schedule every year.

    ReplyDelete
  122. Anonymous1:44 PM

    Yeah, that whole "adding the 12th game will make schedules better" is so bogus. It's all about $$$ and schools whipping on some nobody while charging $65-$85 a pop.

    ReplyDelete
  123. At this point, part of me doesn't mind the 1-AA opponent over UCLA. Like I mentioned earlier, our recent history against BCS opponents sucks, and we'll need all the wins we can get the next couple of years.

    On the other hand, nothing sucks more for fans than a game against a chump team.

    ReplyDelete
  124. Anonymous1:49 PM

    Hey Monica,

    http://www.palmbeachpost.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/palmbeach/ufblog/entries/2009/03/26/auburn_freshman_using_the_powe.html

    ReplyDelete
  125. Anonymous1:50 PM

    I am getting the feeling that Auburn doesn't want to be a big boy.

    Maybe I should go pull for Ole Miss.

    ReplyDelete
  126. Anonymous1:52 PM

    I normally don't comment on Ad scheduling issues, but it is time for AU to step up and play more folks from other areas. Ya really want to help national recruiting?...play UCLA at the Dome.

    Even if we lose the game..let's get in the arena anyway. Grow up JJ.

    ReplyDelete
  127. Anonymous1:56 PM

    Well posted, Hoopie. Couldn't agree more.

    Auburn has got to start acting like we belong with Alabama, Florida, UT and Georgia or we are just another middle of the road SEC program.

    ReplyDelete
  128. Anonymous1:56 PM

    The willingness to embrace mediocrity for Auburn football is staggering.

    ReplyDelete
  129. I never said AU would win only four games next year or that the team wouldn't be improved. Don't know where that came from.

    ReplyDelete
  130. Hoopie ...

    Generally, I agree. Specifically, not this time.

    We already have Clemson on the schedule in 2010, plus the usual Murderer's Row. We would be surrendering a home game to play a game that won't get us as much attention as UAT-Clemson or UAT-Va. Tech because of the remote interest of UCLA.

    Let's schedule a home and home down the road. There's no need to duck anyone. I'm all for the 1 BCS/3 muffins philosophy on the schedule. And BCA can be someone good rather than a Washington State or a K-State.

    ReplyDelete
  131. This whole Facebook thing would be on the radar of someone within the AD, right?

    ReplyDelete
  132. Ben Volin is a confirmed Hottie (in the same sense that Mr. United is).

    ReplyDelete
  133. Anonymous2:13 PM

    Josh didn't say that. I said that last night on the show.

    ReplyDelete
  134. Sensi and Bags apparently sound similar on the internets radio to SteveFC.

    ReplyDelete
  135. Sensi send me an IM when you get a minute please.

    ReplyDelete
  136. Scootie B! It's two job Wednesday!

    ReplyDelete
  137. Sensi to the principal's office.

    ReplyDelete
  138. Hey Josh, I am sorry if I miss quoted you. I thought I heard you say that on gridiron breakdown. So sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  139. I'm pretty sure that Bama and Clemson got some sort of financial guarantee from the Chik Fil A folks over in Atlanta for last year's game.

    Dont know how that matches up with what the normal take is for a home game.......but

    the exposure is worth it IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  140. Anonymous2:28 PM

    I'm not in trouble. I'm trying to get some information for Monica on the job side.

    ReplyDelete
  141. I am willing to rethink my stand if Neuseisel will either:

    a. Promise the first carry to a true freshman.

    or

    b. Bet on Auburn

    ReplyDelete
  142. Jet:

    Rick would probably bet the over.

    ReplyDelete
  143. Yeah, we'll go with that story, Sensi. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  144. Why turn down UCLA?

    Who wants to start

    UCLA - Ga Dome.
    At Miss St
    Clemson.

    ReplyDelete
  145. I thought the games in the Ga. Dome were supposed to be a SEC/ACC challenge.

    Why UCLA?

    How about Free Shoes U or DOOK?

    ReplyDelete
  146. yup. 2 job wednesday! gotta love it.

    ReplyDelete
  147. Joey...

    Looks like three W's to me.

    ReplyDelete
  148. Anonymous2:41 PM

    The Gnome of Unknown said...
    Maybe I should go pull for Ole Miss.
    I'm not trying to be ugly, Gnome, but statements like this really irk me, kidding or not. True fans stick with their team no matter what. I do agree, though, that JJ needs to go.

    ReplyDelete
  149. Anonymous2:42 PM

    Jet, Jay G said this morning that Jermaine Johnson is no longer coming to Auburn.

    ReplyDelete
  150. The Gnome is a sad troll.

    It's a poser.

    Why does that look like 3 W's?

    Florida has shown there's no need in playing more than one tough OC game. Why bother?

    ReplyDelete
  151. I don't know what the big deal is. Jacobs said our schedule is full for 2010. He offered 2012 when we have an opening. Seems to me he's doing his job.

    ReplyDelete
  152. Luv ...

    It was all sarcasm ... none of those folks are on the team now.

    ReplyDelete
  153. Luv.

    He was being Fuh-Seesh-Us.

    Everyone on that list is GONE from AU.

    ReplyDelete
  154. ehyou - its just another NY Times hack peice on Auburn.

    ReplyDelete
  155. "Who wants to start

    UCLA - Ga Dome.
    At Miss St
    Clemson."

    I would. Not that it would matter in 2010, but the BCS couldn't say we weren't putting our best efforts out there schedule wise.

    UCLA and Clemson, two middle of the road teams in their conference and Miss State a lower level SEC school, we shouldn't fear anything close to that even while rebuilding.

    ReplyDelete
  156. ehyou,

    No knowing much about Auburn's schedule....

    Who do they open with?

    ReplyDelete
  157. Scuze me ...

    "None is"

    ReplyDelete
  158. I'm sure you know it's LA Tech FSJ.

    ReplyDelete
  159. Actually I didn't...

    I was too lazy to look it up.

    ReplyDelete
  160. the last few years, tub's staff recruited OLs like bowden recruited RBs. anyone remember demontray (one hand touch) carter and rusty williams? that's why heath evans (a FB) and clifton robinson (a WR) were the featured backs for AU in 1999.

    Here a some names of potential OL backups "on the roster" at the pay sites. some we have heard of some are chris todds in waiting.

    the only healthy viable one i see: jared cooper

    the perpetually injured ones: eddins, odom, greene, roseman.

    then there is vance smith who better be eating as i write this to have any chance at a backup spot.

    last, is the "who the hell is that?" category: charles bates rsfr 6-2/291, andrew parmer rsfr 5-10/266, stephen gibbons rsfr 6-0 /235.

    incoming recruits andre harris and john sullen better be ready to play if there is one starter injured. at least sullen is big enough to get in the way of a DL as the QB rolls away from his side of the line.

    ReplyDelete
  161. Anonymous2:48 PM

    Oh, sorry Jet. I was just glancing through the posts and only Johnson's name stuck out.

    ReplyDelete
  162. I don't see fear as a factor.

    ReplyDelete
  163. The Auburn OL reminds me of the Indians' roster in "Major League."

    GM: "This one's dead."

    Show girl widow/owner: "Then strike him from the list."

    ReplyDelete
  164. Anonymous2:50 PM

    nor did I read the whole post. What an idiot I am.

    ReplyDelete
  165. Don't beat yourself up, Luv.

    I don't read half of what I write, either.

    ReplyDelete
  166. As a fan I would want to see those first three games, but as an AD with my job on the line, I must admit I would not.

    2004 was unique. A big out of conference game would not have gotten us into the NC; the darlings were in it from the beginning. I doubt we will see another undefeated SEC team miss the title game again any time soon. Heck, there was a 2 loss SEC team that one the NC two years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  167. Michael, I agree with you.

    ReplyDelete
  168. 2004 was very unique.

    I know, I know. Something can't be "very unique." It is either unique or not.

    Remember, we let Bowling Green out of a game to play Oklahoma and we get stuck with the Citadel. And it bites us in the butt.

    There's one factor that we like to overlook ... we rose to No. 2 in the poll after the Georgia game ... then we flopped around against a bad Alabama team. Champions drop the hammer. I love that team, and those players. I hate that they didn't get a chance to play USC.

    But we can't point fingers and whine with a straight face. Circumstances didn't help us, but we didn't help ourselves either.

    ReplyDelete
  169. Jet:

    I agree with you about 2004. Had Auburn dropped the hammer on Alabama and Tennessee in the SEC Championship game they would have played for the whole thing.

    ReplyDelete
  170. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think we only rose to a tie for #2 in one of the polls, and we were never all that close in the true BCS rankings. Even if we had killed bama, I don't think we had a shot.

    Someone do the research.

    ReplyDelete
  171. I have to agree with Michale, an undefeated OU and USC would have gone before us no matter how we played the last two games.

    ReplyDelete
  172. Well the thing is michael....Had they dropped the hammer on those two teams it would have at least given the AP poll the option of giving us a split champ.

    ReplyDelete
  173. How would it have been split? USC would have been the champ of both, right?

    ReplyDelete
  174. With what USC did, we could never have jumped them in the AP poll. The AP poll had us close to OK, not USC.

    ReplyDelete
  175. When we didn't hamma Bama, it didn't matter about UT. One of the other two would have had to lost.

    The math will likely show that the Citadel vs. Bowling Green was a killer on the computer. The lack of the hammer hurt on the polls.

    I agree, Michael, with your original premise that we're unlikely to see an unbeaten SEC team miss the title game.

    ReplyDelete
  176. I agree with you about 2004. Had Auburn dropped the hammer on Alabama and Tennessee in the SEC Championship game they would have played for the whole thing.
    No they wouldn't.

    I love this - This is how Bammers say that by them staying with AU in 04 it cost AU a shot at the BCS game.

    It wouldn't have made a damn.

    ReplyDelete
  177. Here's an Auburn man who says by not doing what we should have done it was the legal equivalent of wetting our pants during the closing argument.

    ReplyDelete
  178. My memory may be failing me, but at the time it seemed pretty apparent that OK or USC had to lose for us to leap frog them. Auburn had a better credentials, even with the close bama game. Both USC and OK almost lost to some pretty bad teams.

    Citadel certainly hurt us in the computers, but I am willing to bet my sheep farm that if we had played Bowling Green and beaten bama like we beat Georgia, we still would not have leapfrogged anyone. My opinion is right and anyone who disagrees with me is an idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  179. Michael,

    I don't know why you needed to remind me of that. For crying out loud, I wake up every morning to a note on my refrigerator that says "(Name redacted), you are an idiot." You've been putting it there every night, haven't you?

    ReplyDelete
  180. I must admit that I am a little concerned with being on the same side of the discussion as the biggest Bama hater on earth...

    :-)

    ReplyDelete
  181. Not surprisingly, FSJ, it disturbs me, too.

    ReplyDelete
  182. 2005-2008 AU signed 103 different players. i only counted juco and prep schools guys (like el toro) that were on the list twice as one player. 35 of them that would have had at least one year of eligibility remaining are no longer or never were with the team that is a 34% attrition rate. some of the big names were blackmon, slaughter, alonzo horton, rex sharpe, lee tilley, patrick trahan, greg smith, raven gray, mike harness, bryant miller, enrique davis, bo harris, chaz ramsey. all were four stars or better. two now play for ole miss.

    the new staff had better fix that problem if they want to have any chance whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete
  183. If you think that taking Citadel off our schedule would have gotten us into the NC game, then you are nothing but a bammer!

    ReplyDelete
  184. Other than saying that its so....please give me a reason AU would have jumped Chokelahoma in 2004 by beating the Criminal Tyde any worse than they did.

    Please?

    Make your case so I can take a dump on it.

    ReplyDelete
  185. Michael sleeps with puppets, bears and pirates. So there.

    ReplyDelete
  186. It's just idiot-speak, inverness. When OK almost lost to OSU and USC almost lost to Stanford, Herbstreit and the gang called it great teams figuring out how to win.

    We have a close game against bama, and the media hordes say that we aren't big leaguers. Let the real big boys play for the championship.

    Here's a hint: they never thought we were big leaguers, and we never had a champ of jumping either team and ruining the greatest championship of all time, two perennial national powers fighting to the death to be the greatest champion ever. No chance Auburn is in that game.

    ReplyDelete
  187. Everyone is an idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  188. Mchiel, you are exactly right...oh no, not that everyone is an idiot...your previous post.

    ReplyDelete
  189. Anonymous3:18 PM

    I agree, michael. Auburn wouldn't have played in the NC game because Auburn always gets the shaft.

    ReplyDelete
  190. But because of 2004 we no longer have BCS pre season rankings and won't see another SEC team be left out.

    ReplyDelete