Spring winners
TUESDAY MORNING
Post No. 1,195
So that's another spring practice period in the books. All in all, it unfolded how I expected: Not much access, not much substance. That doesn't mean I'll keep my opinions to myself, of course, because a blog with no slog is a bore.
How do you feel about that?
I sometimes stroll down the avenue as people approach and ask: Mr. Tate, who surprised you this spring? My first instinct is to look for my dad, the real Mr. Tate, but he doesn't know anything about Auburn football. He's a Louisville graduate and a Tulsa fan.
You talkin' to me? Of course. Let me dish.
Photo credit: Todd Van Emst/Auburn University
Post No. 1,195
So that's another spring practice period in the books. All in all, it unfolded how I expected: Not much access, not much substance. That doesn't mean I'll keep my opinions to myself, of course, because a blog with no slog is a bore.
How do you feel about that?
I sometimes stroll down the avenue as people approach and ask: Mr. Tate, who surprised you this spring? My first instinct is to look for my dad, the real Mr. Tate, but he doesn't know anything about Auburn football. He's a Louisville graduate and a Tulsa fan.
You talkin' to me? Of course. Let me dish.
- Neil Caudle: Duh. Here's a kid whom many skeptics believed should be playing at Samford. Instead, he endured his season in exile and now appears to have become a serious contender for the starting job. It's important to note that the interceptions Tony Franklin hated so much really did occur. Still, the word I'm getting is that Caudle wasn't prone to interceptions this spring. He has a chance.
- Onterio McCalebb: He was supposed to be extremely quick and he is extremely quick. What I saw of him matched exactly what the scouting reports indicated. He looks like a future star to me. How far into the future? I think Auburn needs that home-run potential right now.
- Christian Thompson: I had a high opinion of him out of high school (he's a 2008 grad), but the safety driftd from my consciousness last year. That's what the scout team will do for you. I have heard surprisingly enthusiastic chatter about Thompson's refinement throughout the spring. I didn't get much of a chance to see him perform -- I spent most of my practice time watching offensive skill players -- but I expect Thompson to be a useful performer this fall.
- Clinton Durst: I'm not a football coach, but I know me and I know I'd have sent Durst packing this winter. He appeared to have left the team in January. He was upset that Auburn's new coaching staff hadn't yet offered him a scholarship. After the new coaching staff reaffirmed its position that Durst needed to prove himself in the spring, Durst lost his leverage. He came crawling back and did exactly what he said he wouldn't do: Competed for a spot without a scholarship in hand.
He had a good spring. He's a good punter. He'll likely earn that scholarship, but he should be grateful that Gene Chizik doesn't hold grudges.
Photo credit: Todd Van Emst/Auburn University
884 Comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 400 of 884 Newer› Newest»-
Unknown said...
-
- 12:56 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 12:56 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 12:57 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 12:57 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 12:57 PM
-
Eddie McCoy said...
-
- 12:59 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 1:00 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 1:02 PM
-
Eddie McCoy said...
-
- 1:03 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 1:08 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 1:08 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 1:10 PM
-
Eddie McCoy said...
-
- 1:14 PM
-
chip chip said...
-
- 1:14 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 1:15 PM
-
Eddie McCoy said...
-
- 1:18 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 1:21 PM
-
Scott M. Brannan said...
-
- 1:23 PM
-
BinOBA said...
-
- 1:23 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 1:24 PM
-
Eddie McCoy said...
-
- 1:26 PM
-
chip chip said...
-
- 1:27 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 1:28 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 1:29 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 1:37 PM
-
Tar Heel Tiger said...
-
- 1:40 PM
-
War Eagle Girl said...
-
- 1:42 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 1:43 PM
-
AUBigCat said...
-
- 1:47 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 1:50 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 1:51 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 1:55 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 1:56 PM
-
Scott M. Brannan said...
-
- 2:02 PM
-
weagle251 said...
-
- 2:04 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 2:10 PM
-
War Eagle Girl said...
-
- 2:14 PM
-
barkley for governor said...
-
- 2:15 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 2:16 PM
-
Eddie McCoy said...
-
- 2:17 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 2:18 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 2:18 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 2:19 PM
-
barkley for governor said...
-
- 2:19 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 2:20 PM
-
barkley for governor said...
-
- 2:21 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 2:22 PM
-
Scott M. Brannan said...
-
- 2:22 PM
-
Jay G. Tate said...
-
- 2:23 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 2:24 PM
-
Jay G. Tate said...
-
- 2:24 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 2:25 PM
-
barkley for governor said...
-
- 2:26 PM
-
Scott M. Brannan said...
-
- 2:26 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 2:26 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 2:27 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 2:28 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 2:28 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 2:28 PM
-
barkley for governor said...
-
- 2:29 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 2:29 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 2:30 PM
-
War Eagle Girl said...
-
- 2:30 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 2:32 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 2:34 PM
-
Monica said...
-
- 2:36 PM
-
Jay G. Tate said...
-
- 2:37 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 2:37 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 2:40 PM
-
Jay G. Tate said...
-
- 2:41 PM
-
Jay G. Tate said...
-
- 2:41 PM
-
Jay G. Tate said...
-
- 2:42 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 2:44 PM
-
Eddie McCoy said...
-
- 2:45 PM
-
Scott M. Brannan said...
-
- 2:47 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 2:47 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 2:48 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 2:49 PM
-
Tar Heel Tiger said...
-
- 2:49 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 2:50 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 2:50 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 2:51 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 2:52 PM
-
Eddie McCoy said...
-
- 2:53 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 2:53 PM
-
Tar Heel Tiger said...
-
- 2:54 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 2:55 PM
-
Scott M. Brannan said...
-
- 2:55 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 2:55 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 2:56 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 2:56 PM
-
Eddie McCoy said...
-
- 2:56 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 2:59 PM
-
Tar Heel Tiger said...
-
- 3:01 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 3:03 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 3:04 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 3:04 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 3:07 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 3:07 PM
-
Tar Heel Tiger said...
-
- 3:13 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 3:15 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 3:17 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 3:19 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 3:19 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 3:21 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 3:24 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 3:27 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 3:28 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 3:29 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 3:29 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 3:31 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 3:31 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 3:31 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 3:32 PM
-
Quitstina said...
-
- 3:35 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 3:36 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 3:37 PM
-
Quitstina said...
-
- 3:39 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 3:41 PM
-
Jay G. Tate said...
-
- 3:46 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:01 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 4:03 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 4:04 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:05 PM
-
Tar Heel Tiger said...
-
- 4:05 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:06 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:07 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:08 PM
-
Tar Heel Tiger said...
-
- 4:08 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 4:09 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:09 PM
-
barkley for governor said...
-
- 4:09 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 4:09 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:10 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:11 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:11 PM
-
Tar Heel Tiger said...
-
- 4:13 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:13 PM
-
Tar Heel Tiger said...
-
- 4:13 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:14 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:15 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:16 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:16 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:17 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:18 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:18 PM
-
Tar Heel Tiger said...
-
- 4:20 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:20 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 4:21 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:21 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:22 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:23 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 4:23 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 4:23 PM
-
Anonymous said...
-
- 4:23 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:24 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:25 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 4:25 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 4:25 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:26 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:27 PM
-
Unknown said...
-
- 4:27 PM
-
Harrison said...
-
- 4:27 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:28 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 4:29 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:29 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 4:30 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:31 PM
-
Harrison said...
-
- 4:31 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 4:32 PM
-
Harrison said...
-
- 4:32 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:32 PM
-
barkley for governor said...
-
- 4:33 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:33 PM
-
Harrison said...
-
- 4:33 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 4:34 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:35 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 4:36 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:37 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 4:37 PM
-
barkley for governor said...
-
- 4:39 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 4:39 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 4:40 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 4:40 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 4:41 PM
-
barkley for governor said...
-
- 4:42 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:42 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 4:44 PM
-
barkley for governor said...
-
- 4:45 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:45 PM
-
Harrison said...
-
- 4:45 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 4:46 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:46 PM
-
Jet said...
-
- 4:46 PM
-
Peter Frankenschmidt said...
-
- 4:47 PM
-
WarEagleRK said...
-
- 4:48 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 4:49 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 4:49 PM
-
Seanzie said...
-
- 4:49 PM
-
michael said...
-
- 4:49 PM
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 400 of 884 Newer› Newest»
I wish we still played GT every year. Our rivalry with them was one of the oldest in the south.
New Page, Shake N' Bake.
It is hard to believe we use to play Tennessee, Florida, and Georgia Tech every year.
Auburn is in a tough spot because we don't just have another close geographical team we can play every year in a BCS conference because all the good candidates around are already locked up.
Playing Troy wouldn't do us any favors with the OOC either.
Everyone that thinks Ball State is good needs to reaccess them. Ball State is not good and with the loss of 2/3rd's of their starters and a new coach it's going to be a long season this year for them. They are not a bowl team this season.
Eddie, find us a team we could play every year that would be the equivalent of a UGA-GT, FSU-UF, Clemson-USC, heck Ole Miss-Memphis.
We all want the same thing ... a national championship.
It will occur when two things happen -- we win the SEC and all the chips fall the right way.
To play two of these games every year requires one of them to be away from home -- finances aside, that would mean there would be five difficult games (ain't no gimmes in the SEC right now) to play away from your home every year.
That makes the path treacherous.
I don't agree with locking up with 1 team for a long series unless it was GT or FSU, which it won't happen. I would like to see (2) home and away series that offset each other, one being home and one being away. If you want to go find a team to lock up a long series with, I would love it to be Texas.
Latest conspiracy theory, we won't name Neil the starter because, in theory, Kodi could transfer, RS, and then have 2 years to play elsewhere.
Most likely at Boston College.
I don't buy it, we could grant him release if he doesn't go to X,Y,Z school, and if he wants to leave because he's not the starter, fine but make sure the door doesn't hit ya on the way out.
I want Kodi Burns to live up to the hype so bad, but I just don't see it. I don't ever see him being a productive QB. I hope I am wrong, but I don't see the light.
just to throw my opinion into the ring, i would like to see AU play some ACC teams in our traditional recruiting areas. GT, FSU, Clemson (check), Miami, UNC, NCST & Wake would be perfect. Heck, even throw Duke in there now that cutcliffe is there. the virginia schools and BC are too far away for fans to travel to easily. i know miami is a haul but it's miami and we recruit there more than the northeast. if AU is where it needs to be in 3-5 years, most of those should be very very winnable and provide excellent exposure in our recruiting geography.
Jay is getting to talk today = Good
Speaking of baseball, the Braves are stinking it up in mid-season form right now!
They can turn it around just as easily, the Marlins sweep was unfortunate but the bats disappeared at the wrong time. They still need to get a second set-up guy that won't blow innings.
eddie, i feel the same way you do about Kodi.
anyone else gettin a choppy feed?
not me, Bin
Not me either Bin.
i have been a big proponent of playing AT Hawaii every 5 years. they are obviously not opposed to a trip around the world as they played at UF and UAT recently. i think it would be great to have a rotating home and home with them. AU fans could plan a vacation to Hawaii and it would be a blast to invade the islands with orange and blue. that would also be a recruiting bonus with guys knowing they will get to go to Hawaii once in their college career.
it would be an awesome season opener. call me crazy but i would try to go. it just has to give fans a chance to plan and budget for the travel years in advance.
example:
at hawaii 2015
hawaii at AU sometime 2016-2019
at hawaii 2020
Who is covering the congressional hearings on bailing out the newspaper industry?
Monica ...
Accept my apologies for posting in such a way for implying you are not bright. We both know otherwise. It was not my intent, but I certainly understand that it could be received that way. Full apologies, without caveat.
Thank you for the very kind apology, Jet. You are a gentleman.
Finally, a bailout I can support (as long as it all goes to Jay GT).
jet, for a minute there I thought you were going to confess to being Mr U!!!
WEG ...
Shhhhh.
Jay G I need you to ask Luper if Ben Tate had to run laps after doing the "Stanky leg" dance when he scored that TD on A-Day. The college guys sitting behind me went wild when he did it. It was kinda funny.
For those who dont have younguns or are just not into this generations fads you will can youtube it. The song and dance are so ignorant that they will grow on you it you're not careful.
I love Jay G Tate as much as the next guy, but bailing out the newspaper industry is wasting money. It will never again be a profitable industry, and the money will only delay the demise. Unlike the banks, the taxpayers bailout money will be lost and never repayed.
PF ...
Sadly, you are correct.
Never heard of the Stanky Leg dance until now. I'm totally breaking that out at the next wedding I do to.
go to, not do to.
i have heard of that song. i had no idea there was a dance too.
Sooo... Stanky Leg = This Year's Soulja Boy?
Is Saban trying to get his fans ready for a less than championship season?
okay, I had to go look at the Stanky Leg Dance....guess I'm just an old person again! Never even heard of it. Looks like fun though! Guess it's sort of a funky line dance.
That's what Charles from Reeltown is suggesting. Since Finebaum thinks he may be right, he calls him an idiot and cuts him off.
G Spot Boyz (of newfound Stanky Leg fame) are gonna be performing in the Gump tomorrow. Can someone get them a HABOTN t-shirt?
Remind me why it is that I have Finebaum on right now. All the callers are idiots.
But Eddie! OMG they are cracking me UP! Mercy I needed a good ole laugh like that.
Fbaum is trying to have a real conversation with his idiots. He can't be surprised it's not working, right? SNORT
Be careful about listening to Finebaum ... it will rot out your teeth, age you, and make you look like you're on meth.
I just had it on because it rolled over after the Roundtable. One segment was enough for today.
Charles is an idiot. Birds of a feather, etc.
I'm a little surprised to hear Saban tossing the blame for the Sugar Bowl loss on to the shoulders of his fans.
Calling Charles an idiot is like saying the grass is green....
Do you really need to point it out?
I listen and I don't care who knows or who approves, etc.
Saban is an a$$. that's just the way it is.
it couldn't be his fault they lost, could it? nah. that makes too much sense.
I don't like the idea of a newspaper bailout. We don't need money; we need direction.
Plus, newspapers will be fine as non-profit enterprises. I think that's where we're headed. I still can report, I still can earn an average wage and I still can enjoy the thrill of chasing a good story.
I want to hear from our bama fans. How do you feel about what Saban said about you?
Did the Roundtable work today?
We joke so much that I kinda lose track if it's an interesting show ...
It was a like a private joke that went on too long, Jay G.
Anytime you and the black guy are on the show, it turns out great. Tomorrow it's back to Max your community credit union.
i heard most of the last hour. it was kinda random at times but funny.
At least Kalvin (or Kelvin - sorry not sure) seemed to be a little more calm today.
The Kalvin at Talledega shtick is sort of done to death, but I just heart the last 45 minutes.
What do you mean by nonprofit enterprise, Jay? Like you are supported by charities or something?
Saban just wants the blue hairs that buy up tickets to Bama games and sit on their hands to get fired up or get out. He doesn't give a rat's end about Bama tradition. He's all about tomorrow.
Or puppets?
I'll take anything over Max putting parties, or tributes to Phil Snow
I like that F-Bomb has to take an OT jab at Chiz right before a commercial break.
FBaum is contractually required to whiz on Auburn at least twice per hour.
maybe saban is preparing the tide for him leaving after they get on probation???
HA That was funny. Bless his little bammer heart.
Sensi - You've bailed on me.
I thought the show was good. It's an intimate feeling show, anyway, so I think the constant joking adds to it...as long as the trivia girls aren't around.
I'm sorry, Sensi! You didn't bail on me. I found your email. Please forgive me!
Non-profit doesn't mean "charity."
It means we're not betrothed to a bottom line the way we are now.
Mea Culpa accepted Mon.
Jay G, do you think there will still be actual paper, though?
I've been under the impression that it will be fully online.
Didn't you tell me that the biggest overhead is the big rolls of paper? Get rid of that, and the $.50/day won't be necessary.
Seth Godin shared his opinionthe other day.
There's plenty of money in newspapers ... if you're not attempting to support massive, money-losing enterprises located 800 miles from Montgomery.
The biggest overhead is supporting USA Today. Period.
Gotta go do a story on Montgomery Academy track. I'll check back a little later.
Local papers support USA Today? You will have to explain the newspaper biz to me someday, Jay, because I admittedly know nothing about it.
This is the point I turn Finebaum off.
Eddie, have you lost more weight? you look like you're withering away? :)
What, Jay G?
You're not staffing the all-important STJ-Catholic soccer tilt tonight?
Michael - The company that owns JGT's paper is Gannett which is outside of DC. Gannett, owns TV stations as well as other papers nationally. They also own USA Today.
When the local paper is a branch of the company that owns USA Today, and USA Today is losing money, yes, Michael.
Suppose company X makes widgets. Widget A,B,C, and D are profitable, but are sold at a low volume. Widget Z is widely distributed and takes in a huge amount or revenue, but is very costly. Essentially, the profits that A,B,C, and D make keep the company afloat so that don't go out of business due to the costs from Z. It would be smart for Company X to get rid of the Widget Z division, but since it is their flagship, and they have been operating this way for years and years, they refuse to do so.
Michael,
Gannett owns/= USA Today. Gannett also owns MA amongst others, I believe. It's like colonial America when all the local profits went to GB.
Gannett is number 371 on the Fortune 500 list. In addition to being on the list, they are the #14 money loser on the list. I only bring this up with JGT covering track.
Just read on wikipedia that USA Today is a Gannett newspaper. Wow. That is kind of like on Lost where we just found out Miles' dad is the dude on all those videos. What a twist! Shows my ignorance, I didn't know that.
But I love the USA Today; is it really not making money? You still see it everywhere. The website is pretty popular.
One last thing that is causing issues for USA Today. Marriott has decided to not give everyone a paper every morning. Additional loss.
Well it looks like if I had been a little more patient I would have received my answer without having to look at wikipedia. Usually I get annoyed when people ask easily googled questions here , but now I am starting to see how it is appealing.
Scottie- Yepp, still loosing weight. Down 89 pounds right now. Still would like to loose another 20 pounds, but i'm very happy where I am right now. I'm skinnier than I was in high school. Nice to be in XL's and below 40's in pant size.
Fortune 500 rank: 371
Loss: $6.6 billion
Read all about it: Newspapers around the world had a rough year. Circulation of USA Today, the largest of Gannett's 102 daily papers, slipped 2%, and the company's newspaper group overall saw a 13% decline in revenue, thanks to shrinking circulation and advertising revenue. Gannett wrote down the value of its U.K. newspapers by $2.1 billion and its U.S. newspapers by $4.4 billion.
Even operating income in its digital group, which includes ShopLocal.com and CareerBuilder.com, dropped 18% last year. The good news, such as it is, is that revenue in the broadcast group, which owns 23 TV stations, was steady, despite drop-offs in auto and retail ads. The bad news is that there are no Olympics or presidential elections in the offing to give this year's numbers a similar boost.
FEATURED GAME:
APRIL 21, 7:00PM ET
PENGUINS AT FLYERS
WATCH LIVE ON VERSUS
$6.6B poof!
congrats Eddie. lookin' good bro.
@NatHistoryWhale is my favorite twitterer. My friends are kinda boring. Having the fake whale that hangs on the ceiling at the Natural History Museum send me 140 character messages is fun.
THT - Caps are coming back.....I would like to see a playoff with Caps vs. Pens....Caps in 6...if we can get past the Rangers for goodness sakes.
Keep it up, Eduardo.
You may inspire me to get serious again.
Thanks Scottie!
Eddie, congrats on the weight loss.
AU1 -
I don't want to count my chickens when all I've got is eggs, but IF the Pens make it to the next round, they'll have trouble making it any further. Pens owned the Caps in the 90s, but such is not the case nowadays. Rangers are always tough on Pens. Bruins, Devils, or 'canes would be better options for the Pens, I think (I'm already assuming Habs are out).
Eddie - Congrats on your loss....but I think I found it. It moved to Baltimore. I will keep it and get rid of it for you during my soccer season.
I'm expecting the Bruins vs Rangers to be a good series. I'll be rooting for the Bruins, but I love Sean Avery.
THT - Well I feel the same way being down 2-1. I will touch base should things work out. : )
299
300 and heading home
This comment has been removed by the author.
Eddie, thanks for picking up the tougher schedule flame and running with it for me while I was gone.
We seem to be on the same page.
Oh, so you want that again, RK?
Huh?
Go ahead, then. Just go ahead.
Bring it.
Then again, don't. I'm tired.
Luginbill on Finebaum: UT's cupboard is a lot emptier than anyone thought. If Eric Berry played offense, he's easily be the best player. No RB depth, horrible offensive line.
Think's the ball is rolling in Alabama but they still need upgrades at certain positions to contend.
Says Auburn should be better than last year, good running backs, good group of defensive players, depth at O-line is troubling and looks for us to sign 6-7 OL this class.
Jet, this is probably one that we'll have to agree to disagree on, and I'll just feel that I'm right and we'll be fine.
Nothing like a good dental cleaning to make you more mellow in the afternoon.
I can think of a few things that are better at making me mellow in the afternoon than a trip to the dentist.
Well after you've had someone scrape on your teeth for 30 mins, suddenly a debate over something completely out of your control seems pointless.
My input on the schedule: just does not matter that much. I seriously doubt any recruit would be swayed by a win or loss in an extra good game. It would give us something to thump our chests about if we won, but come 2010, I am guessing commentators will be patting us on the back for playing Clemson, and no one is going to really give a crap that we didn't schedule UCLA.
I wish we would have scheduled them, but come on, enough of this "It's the end of the world and this proves that Jay Jacobs is an idiot and also proves the athletic department is not committed to making us a national power and now our kids won't go as high in the draft blah blah blah".
I understood, RK, was just cutting up. We've established that I'm not funny, though.
Seanzie, that UT comment is interesting. I think they probably had a similar situation to Auburn: a lot of their problems came from recruits not panning out or just not landing prime recruits instead of coaches forgetting how to coach.
Michael ...
That ... was ... beautiful.
Michael, cut it out. You're not allowed to be reasonable.
All of a sudden I'm not worried about our road trip to Knoxville.
Sorry PF.
so how come puppets drink blood but never urinate?
Can we start puppet hour early?
Again, I agree with Mcheila. Not about the puppet urine. that's just sick...about the schedule.
Good afternoon, hotties.
52 years old? Yikes.
Kristina, I think we have been in agreement on just about everything ever. We should form an Alliance. We can call it the lAllaince.
Yes, we have. Yes, we should. Yes, that's a little scary.
As a reminder, today is free ice cream cone day at Ben and Jerry's across the nation.
Thanks for all the Gannett info. I didn't know just how bad it was...
"Seanzie said...
Eddie, find us a team we could play every year that would be the equivalent of a UGA-GT, FSU-UF, Clemson-USC, heck Ole Miss-Memphis."The obvious answer here would be GT. Bring back the wreck tech pajama party.
GT doesn't count Steve, they're already locked up.
I mean we could, but I'm not sure they'd do it.
Hmmm, why does not playing UCLA have anything to do with us being a national power. We are in the SEC for gosh sakes. Go undefeated. That is all that is required. If we win all our SEC games, nobody will care when we schedule that one game against the Ethiopian cave dwellers.
I wish we still played Howard and Mercer. But not Sewanee. They kicked our butts.
Why would we not want to play UCLA?
Locked up, schmocked up. GT use to be a permanent opponent. If they don't have a free spot on their schedule, we need to kick South Carolina out of the SEC and bring GT home. South Carolina has always had ACC written all over them.
I want a Sewanee t-shirt.
I'm all for home/home with Miami, FL.
Ole Miss-Memphis?
Don't see a need to play UCLA. They are in the PAC Ten. PAC Ten!!! Yik!!!
Why would we not want to play UCLA?
RK, I can't think of a good answer for that.
They play every year, I'm told.
We played Miami back in the late 70s I believe, but that was when they were still a school for the handicapped or blind or something.
ABC handed us a game to kick off the season on prime time national television and we turned it down. No matter the reasoning ($) it makes us look bad.
We played Miami in the kickoff classic in 84 as well.
Alonzo Highsmith ran ~50 yards for TD on a draw play at end of 1st half. I was furious at our pathetic defense. That was ~76 or so. UM was #6 in 1968 when we stomped them 31-6. All-American DT David Campbell was a MONSTER that game.
No, getting the crap kicked out of us in the first game would make us look bad. Something not happening doesn't do anything. Man, not playing Notre Dame is making us look bad. Not playing Michigan is making us look bad. Nope. It is a non-story.
who remembers the 78-0 whuppin' we put on Mercer?
I don't either, but let's have another!
Ah, I remember that butt kicking, I mean kickoff classic. Yea, it was pretty bad.
Steve,
Did someone offer us a game vs Michigan or Notre Dame?
If we aren't playing games because we're afraid we'll lose them then this program is down much much more than I ever imagined.
Auburn has a long storied history of shoot the crap out of a potential great season by playing a very good team in the first game. Miami is an example. Texas was another example. We don't even want to get into USC or GT. I am not sure why people would think that not getting the crap kicked out of us in the first game would spoil our reputation. Guess what folks. We are in rebuilding mode.
The Miami game in 84 is much like the GT game in 05...we come off of a monster year expecting great things the next year and fall flat on our face.
So Auburn losing against decent teams in openers is like the sun rising, we just have to accept that it's going to happen if we schedule them?
WarEagleRK, this program is down much more than I ever guessed it would be. The number or recruits we lost, the players we lost, and losing the entire coaching staff will have an effect. I think Chizik has done well under the circumstances, but the people that thought the 11-2 season was crappy a couple of years ago are going to be dreaming of the days we could win 9 games for a bit.
history doesn't lie. we stink in opening/very early "blockbuster" non-conference games. For that reason, I'm against them. Being 2-0 is better than 1-1 or 0-2 no matter who you played. Stick a top 10 Nonconf team in the middle of the SEC grind like we did in 83 and we'll be ok.
Is is rebuilding the reason we turned them down?
I've heard we schedule one BCS opponent a year non conference.
I've heard we can't lose that precious 8th home game.
I've heard we already have our schedule made for 2010.
It seems to change every time someone different justifies it.
But do you think it was fair that the BC coach was fired for looking elsewhere? Isn't this America?
Believe it or not, there can be numerous reasons something doesn't or shouldn't happen.
Michael, from what I understand BC has a new policy that any coach that interviews for a coaching position must be fired, so basically any coach the interview and hire must go.
People complained before last year that we had West Virginia in the middle of the SEC schedule...that it wasn't fair to travel to WVU after we started the SEC.
If the stigma of the program is we can't win non-conference games early and that's how it is always going to be, then we really need to reevaluate our programs overall standing or do something to remove that stigma other than scheduling UTC and Arkansas State.
rk, I think the real reason is money, but it makes people happy/unhappy for various other reasons. Truth is, no one knows why we turned it because we are not Jay Jacobs.
RK, the program IS down.
Seanzie, just because they play every year doesn't make it relevant game. The rest of those games listed are usually relevant. I'm not sure that one ever has been.
JGT - I only posted after I thought you were gone. Specifically for that reason. Sorry.
UTC and Arkansas State are fine. I expect a couple of games like that. I am happy to see West Virginia on the schedule and Clemson too.
Southern Cal stunk for a decade, I guess Pete Carroll should have came in and expected to be .500 and definately shouldn't have kicked off his 2nd and 3rd seasons playing Auburn.
That game means a lot in Memphis, PF. Elsewhere...including Oxford... not so much.
I think we can all agree that USC is where they are today because they scheduled Auburn those two years. You're welcome, Pete.
I suspect money has a lot to do with it. People that whine about opponents or the size of our stadium should step up and get to games. If you sell out the stadium regularly, the games will come.
It didn't hurt. He got two prime time national TV games against a team people have heard about ...won both games and started his seasons off on a roll.
Guess what game during the 2003 season ruined that season and likely cost us a shot at the NC in 2004?
Maybe that's what Neuheisel was thinking.
step 1:schedule auburn
step 2: win??
step 3: greatest team ever
Like I said before. It's just short sighted. Yes there is more money right away in playing Arkansas State at home rather than UCLA on the road. However in the big picture the UCLA game could potentially do far more for the program in the long run.
I am sick of California using us as a stepping stool. Take your hippies and sissy football teams and jump in the pacific!
SteveFC,
The answer to that question was Georgia Tech. If we bounced back at a below average Tech team in 03 then the USC game wouldn't have ruined anything.
If we went 11-1 just losing to a USC team that turned out to be great, we would have had a great season.
That would also mean we beat LSU and gotten to the BCS championship game. That would be a good season.
The thing is, UCLA didn't come to us, it was the network that came to the SEC and the SEC suggested that Auburn play in that game.
If the opportunity comes up again, ABC or the SEC might not be so happy to make that call to us again.
yeah but we bounced back at Vandy bigtime!!
Hey Pete, I was just throwing that out there to make a point, as in it's a regionally based annual matchup. I never said it was relevant.
i dont think we would have beaten LSU and UGA, since we got beat by a combined total of like 87-12.
I went to both of those games, by the way. Not Fun
The bad thing about the Vandy game in 03, I was scared when it as 0-0 at the end of the 1st quarter and we hadn't scored a TD in 9 quarters.
So are some people saying we shouldn't play UCLA because we might lose?
I don't think we beat those teams either in 03. The USC game didn't ruin anything that year, Bobby Petrino leaving for Louisville and us replacing him with Nallsminger ruined 03 long before the opening kickoff vs USC.
I also went to that vandy game. But for nightlife afterwards really
Well, if Auburn beats UCLA on the way to an undefeated season, then the BCS Championship Game payout will make up for the small Chick-Fil-A Kickoff Classic payout.
Barkley, we're rebuilding. Obviously we shouldn't play a mid level Pac 10 team in our own back yard right now.
The dead horse is being beaten to death in it's next life.
What else is there to talk about?
The only reason we're still talking about it because some people are taking it as a shot to their ego, which is dumb. That's what Bammer does. Auburn isn't scared and doesn't have to play UCLA. We get on National TV enough, people know about the Auburn program, we've earned the right not have to go play anyone, anytime.
Maybe it is a little bit selfish of me, but I would just get more entertainment out of a UCLA game than an Arkansas St. game. I think as a fan, it's that simple. You want to watch your teams play in the more entertaining games. I would rather see us lose to UCLA in a good game than beat Arkansas St. 34-0.
There's obviously a lot that goes into the decision as an athletic director, but I really don't want to hear it was because of financial reasons. That just sounds bad. We just paid a coach millions of dollars to go home, and have some of the highest paid assistants in the country.
I don't think it's crazy to avoid playing two quality nonSEC programs a year. One is fine with me.
Like I said earlier, I wish we had scheduled UCLA, but who cares? I like a good game, but the truth is the risk outweighs the reward. On one end of the spectrum, we could win, supposedly suddenly we get national respect for beating a rebuilding PAC 10 team that we might not get beating SEC teams, and when the end of the year comes, if it just happens we are on the edge of making the National Title game or being the last BCS at large berth, playing a nonconference BCS program will come in handy.
Now the downside: suppose we lose, and that one game keeps us out of the BCS or out of the SEC championship game (in the case of a three way tie in our division) or keeping us out of a bowl by giving us a losing record.
Neither of these scenarios are all that likely; most likely what will happen is people will forget about the game by the end of the season.
You guys have ruined Puppet Hour.
Hey, I've been out for a while.
What's up?
Don't read any of the previous comments Jet, you have seen them before.
My Xbox just got the red ring of death...
Maybe I should have stuck with Sony.
Not a shot to my ego, nor am I dumb nor am I a Bammer.
It does add value to a season ticket package. So maybe a shot to my wallet. I'd rather see us excited to play in the Ga Dome vs a name school with 72,000 people on their feet rather than play Arkansas State at Jordan Hare with 20,000 empty seats and almost the entire student section gone by halftime. Maybe I'm weird like that.
Again, I ask, why would we not want to play UCLA?
RK to clarify, I didn't call you a Bammer or dumb. Just sayin'.
There is no logical answer to that, RK.
We will just have to take the media shots now. I think I heard Luginbill say something about it today on Finebaum....
Oh I know, but you did classify everyone who would want to see the UCLA game as taking it as a shot to their ego. Which it's not. There are a lot of fans who see the benefit of playing that game, win or lose, over playing Ark State.
maybe Arkansas St. will have a big year this year. That'll show everybody
barkley - Jacobs didn't say it was for financial reasons, that is just fans reading in between the lines. He said something about how we already have a full schedule and we would love to play them in 2012 or something like that. The masses believe that might be a bit of baloney.
By the way UCLA was 4-8 last year...worse than us. Right now they are a threat in name alone.
Must ... resist ... urge.
That guy on the radio called us all paranoid Monk-type crazy fans. I'd say he was right on. It was certainly favorable to his description of Bammers.
Ehhh...It's something to talk about to pass the time until there is actually something to talk about.
Why does everyone bring up poor Arkansas State, what about the other vapor we play that year, Chattanooga and LaMo?
From a fan's perspective, the UCLA game has greater value, there's no argument there.
400.
Just wondering.. how many recruits listen to Luginbill or Finebaum? How many actually let them influence where they go to school? How likely is it that mainstream media actually picks up on this non-story? Does anyone other than Auburn fans know that Bowling Green backed out of a game with us in 2004?
I stand by my stance that this decision will have zero effect on the state of our program.
Puppets.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home